Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update of Phase2 Tracker Digitizer to fix an issue in Premixing #42938

Merged

Conversation

suchandradutta
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Updating Phase2TrackerDigitizerAlgorithm to fix the issue observed during Premixing of PU events at the Digitization. It was observed that the Digitized signal gets lowered and correspondingly # Digis are lower than expected in inner Pixel layers . It was found that this is due to the fact that the Dual-Slope signal scaling is used. It is now fixed using simple liner scaling of charge during the first step of Pre-Mixing.

  • Changes are NOT expected! As shown in the validation plots, the PreMixing and noPreMixing show similar behaviour as expected.
  • NO other PRs or externals it depends upon it
  • The details of the code change and the validation results are reported to Tk Phase2 Simulation group Link

@emiglior

…arge in # of Digis in inner Pixel modules when Premixing is used during Digitization together with Dual Slope signal scaling
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42938/37085

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @suchandradutta (Suchandra Dutta) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimTracker/SiPhase2Digitizer (upgrade, simulation)

@AdrianoDee, @cmsbuild, @mdhildreth, @civanch, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@dgulhan, @rovere, @VourMa, @mmusich, @missirol, @threus, @mtosi, @VinInn, @JanFSchulte, @GiacomoSguazzoni this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 3, 2023

test parameters:

  • workflow = 25034.999

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 3, 2023

@cmsbuild please test

@@ -233,11 +233,17 @@
AddNoisyPixels = False,
AddInefficiency = False,
AddThresholdSmearing = False,
Phase2ReadoutMode = -1,
AdcFullScale = 255,
AddXTalk = False,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would recommend documenting this here:

# For premixing stage1
# - add noise as by default
# - do not add noisy pixels (to be done in stage2)
# - do not apply inefficiency (to be done in stage2)
# - disable threshold smearing

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e80085/35029/summary.html
COMMIT: 12a0066
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-10-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42938/35029/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 3 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 2460 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3358320
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 25646
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3332617
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 48 workflows

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 3, 2023

Hi @suchandradutta
Could you please confirm that DQM plot shown by PR test is as expected? For example, DigiOccupancyVsEtaP of Barrel IT here.

I assume the change is expected, only Phase-2 PreMix is changed with this PR.

@suchandradutta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @suchandradutta Could you please confirm that DQM plot shown by PR test is as expected? For example, DigiOccupancyVsEtaP of Barrel IT here.

I assume the change is expected, only Phase-2 PreMix is changed with this PR.

@srimanob can you please let me know the workflow number where the difference is seen? So that I can re-run and check.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 4, 2023

Hi @suchandradutta Could you please confirm that DQM plot shown by PR test is as expected? For example, DigiOccupancyVsEtaP of Barrel IT here.
I assume the change is expected, only Phase-2 PreMix is changed with this PR.

@srimanob can you please let me know the workflow number where the difference is seen? So that I can re-run and check.

25034.999

…off X-Talk for OT layers alsoat the first step of PreMixing
@suchandradutta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @suchandradutta Could you please confirm that DQM plot shown by PR test is as expected? For example, DigiOccupancyVsEtaP of Barrel IT here.

I assume the change is expected, only Phase-2 PreMix is changed with this PR.

@srimanob I can fully confirm the changes observed in Inner Tracker Digi Occupancy/Charge histograms exactly as expected. I have updated the configuration file with some comments and switched off x-talk simulation also fo outer tracker layers in first step of PreMixing. Test were also done with the updated configuration file.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42938/37102

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 5, 2023

Pull request #42938 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 5, 2023

@cmsbuild please test

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 8, 2023

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 8, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e80085/35092/summary.html
COMMIT: 8f397b7
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-10-08-0000/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/42938/35092/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 3060 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3356920
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2019
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3354844
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 48 workflows

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 9, 2023

+1

only phase2 WFs are affected, which is expected

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Oct 9, 2023

+Upgrade

Change on Phase-2 premix workflow is expected.
@civanch do you want the update to present at FullSim meeting?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 9, 2023

yes, we may discuss this Friday.

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6403d0e into cms-sw:master Oct 9, 2023
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants